That's why its a demand (as in: "not currently how it is but rather how it should be, trying to get what is changed to how it should be").

Also, I never said that anyone who is ever negligent should be barred from driving an automobile vehicle on the public roadways again. I do quite often say those who, with an automobile on the public roadways, have committed "gross negligence resulting in the death of an innocent" (may not always have used that exact wording) should be barred from driving an automobile vehicle on the public roadway in the future.

As to those who just drive anyway with a suspended license, the only way to deal with that is to come down like the proverbial bag of hammers on those who do. I do not deny that, and have even at publicly stated more then once that in some cases some people should be barred from engaging in certain actives where they have already been negligent and got other people killed and have demonstrated the "clear and present lethal danger" they represent and under the threat of a death penalty if they ever do such again. I don't care if its cars or guns, some people that is the only way to deal with them and still have a half way civilized society and not have them destroy it. I certainly don't think that extreme of a measure is necessary in all cases by any means, and I don't think it should ever go to that level unless people are already dead as a result of that particular perp. and its beyond question that they can't be trusted and they have demonstrated that by means of dead bodies already. But with some of these nuts its unfortunately necessary including actually following through when necessary and it not just being an empty threat.

I'm not a proponent of "gun control" or "car control". I strongly believe in "nut control", we have got to start dealing with the psychopaths in or society who treat the property, health, and very lives of others as so cheap as to not even be worthy of the slightest consideration otherwise they tend to multiply !!!!!!!!!!!