View Single Post
Old 10-24-13 | 07:45 AM
  #100  
Ridefreemc's Avatar
Ridefreemc
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 6
From: Western Florida

Bikes: 2017 Kona TI, 2011 Mezzo D9, Gazelle Ultimate C380

Originally Posted by KonAaron Snake
I've owned 5 ti bikes and currently own three...my two Litespeed built ti road frames were total dogs and very flexie (both sold). Which era of Litespeed was this? Lynskey or post-Lynskey? People make too much out of materials - it's all about the builder matching a tool to your preferences. You can undoubtedly get a fine bicycle from steel or ti.

The advantages to ti are:

No paint chips - no worry about leaning it and parking it.
Slight weight savings - not significant to me.
Great as rain/winter bikes because they're totally immune to oxidation.

The disadvantages are:

Cost.
Harder to cold set (though some steels also can't be cold set).
I prefer the aesthetics of lugs.
Fewer builders working in it.

I think because ti is newer, and because it can be more difficult to work with (and less forgiving of errors) I'd be very limited with who I bought a ti frame from. I'd really stick to the big names - Moots, Firefly, IF, Seven, Spectrum...and that's about it. I know that I left one or two off.
Not sure which build the Litespeed was, but the year was probably about late-2005. I guess I'm glad to hear you say that though and now I probably don't need to discount the material because of my experience with the Litespeed.

Last edited by Ridefreemc; 10-24-13 at 08:02 AM.
Ridefreemc is offline  
Reply