View Single Post
Old 11-03-13 | 08:50 AM
  #3  
Looigi's Avatar
Looigi
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,951
Likes: 14
Originally Posted by Bacciagalupe
I use both a compact double and a triple. IMO the only reason to go with a triple is if you really need lower gearing -- e.g. touring and ultracycling (100+ mile) events.

With a compact, the trick is to shift the front and back together. E.g. when I shift from the little ring to the big ring, I also shift the cassette down 2 gears. It quickly becomes a habit.

With a triple, the gaps aren't as wide but are still there. I don't think you'll get any real advantage, unless you want to get much lower gears.

And yes, you'll have to swap out lots of parts -- bottom bracket spindle, crankset, possibly the front derailleur.

I say the best thing is to adjust your technique. It won't take long to get used to it.
Agree with all the points. I have two bikes with the usual road triples (30, 42, 52) and two with 34-50 compact doubles. There are pros and cons comparing them, but overall I prefer the compact double.
Looigi is offline  
Reply