View Single Post
Old 11-21-13 | 09:05 AM
  #89  
rekmeyata's Avatar
rekmeyata
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,962
Likes: 389
From: NE Indiana

Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS

Originally Posted by ItsJustMe
I'd be more tempted by the Philips if it had a better run time. For all this talk of "less light is needed" they still don't have any better run time than the "wasteful" lights that are 2 or 3 or 4 times brighter.
When you look at lights you do have to figure out how long you need it to run for at night, I like the Phillips but I never ride for more than two hours anyways after dark...but I also rarely put it on high so on low it will run for 8 hours, so for me I have more battery then I'll ever need on a ride.

Keep in mind that those lights that are 2 to 4 times brighter (in the MTBR beamshot comparisons) are a lot more expensive and they have a separate battery that you have to mount to the bike. For some people mounting a battery and having another run of wire on a bike is no big deal, it isn't a big deal for me either, but I prefer not having a separate battery, but for others they may hate the idea of a separate battery.

Performance has a decent sale on a couple of decent lights; this one is the brightest but has a separate bat pack, decent run time on medium and low: http://www.performancebike.com/bikes...42508__1842508

The next one has slightly lower run times but has a self contained bat: http://www.performancebike.com/bikes...42508__1842508

Last edited by rekmeyata; 11-21-13 at 09:33 AM.
rekmeyata is offline  
Reply