View Single Post
Old 11-26-13, 07:49 PM
  #51  
JiveTurkey
Low car diet
 
JiveTurkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Corvallis, OR, USA
Posts: 2,407

Bikes: 2006 Windsor Dover w/105, 2007 GT Avalanche w/XT, 1995 Trek 820 setup for touring, 201? Yeah single-speed folder, 199? Huffy tandem.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by rekmeyata
I'm not sure I understand you. The size of wheel combined with the a fat MTB tire, in your example is 26" which is as tall as a 700x23, but I wasn't talking about those two types of tires, and even if I were the size is the same from the ground to the top of both tires, thus whatever point you're trying to make is moot. The point of having chainring size change would be if you have two wheels, with tires, one would be say 27" and the other say 20" and to get the same speed from a similar performing cyclist riding each bike would require a different gear ring size on the smaller one so he can keep up with the larger wheel/tire cyclist, thus the weight of the larger chainring would off set the weight of the reduced size wheel/tire combo.

My point was the comfort issue more than anything else since I know so little about the other stuff, so I found this to help explain that more than I did: http://sheldonbrown.com/650b.html
You're both making the same point: If effective tire diameter is the same, then it will have no effect on gearing. If they're different, then it will.

The mistake you made was referring to the difference in "rim" diameter, as opposed to overall "tire" diameter, as an 8mm reduction in rim size (27"/630 to 700c/622) can be made up for by increasing the tire size by 4 mm radius/8 mm diameter; for example, 27x1 1/8 to 700x32c. They're both about 686-687 mm total tire diameter.

Last edited by JiveTurkey; 11-26-13 at 07:55 PM.
JiveTurkey is offline