Originally Posted by orangeology

you are right. defining clearly(=more precisely) then can bear another room here, tho.
the canadian guy isn't manufacturing a bicycle. he manufactures a bicycle component.

what S is doing seems nothing but marking the territory by peeing as large as possible, at least to me.
and they do that knowing the local guy has no monetary power to properly defend whatever he believes right—regardless he's right or not.
whether a common sense or moral sympathy can be effective when it comes to a lawsuit on an IP, it's two different things.

i will stop here as i have no intention of giving an impression of arguing over something with someone who has a different POV.