View Single Post
Old 12-26-13, 06:38 PM
  #21  
uluchay
Squeaky Bottom Bracket
 
uluchay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Lake Como, Italy
Posts: 164

Bikes: 2009 Trek 1.2 // 70's Olmo Gentleman

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bigfred
It's a GURU, probably custom geometry. Chances are pretty good that he was custom fit for it on an X,Y fitting tool by a reasonably competant fitter. That may be the best position he could get Gordon into. The tall stack dimension is probably the consequence of his inflexibility and inability to comfortably get any lower than that. As his upper body rotates upwards the reach would have to be shortened accordingly. If you imagine Gordon rotating his pelvis and torso to a lower position you can see how it would necessitate a increased reach to his arm supports with a corresponding decrease in stack and increase in reach (top tube length or stem).

Make sense?
Makes perfect sense,

Just one thing though; I know triathlons are not UCI events and most regulations do not apply, does that mean you could race a bike that is lighter than 6.8 kg in a triathlon?
uluchay is offline