Originally Posted by
WalksOn2Wheels
...... From the beginning, and even today, I will not ride without my helmet and a front and rear light. The helmet is it's own thread (like that overblown sticky), but I wear it because I'm interested in living and don't trust drivers. Lights just flat out make sense.
However, I REFUSE to live a life where I must don hi-vis vests at all times, wear a helmet mirror, constantly run a go-pro camera for collecting evidence, or run seven rear lights and 4 front. That would simply suck all the joy out of biking for me. It would feel like letting the terrorists win.
I just re-read through this thread.... of course beginning at the beginning. I think the OP made an excellent point about diminishing returns... although I am not sure that was his actual intent. I wear a helmet even though it is likely over-kill it is also a lot of protection for very little cost or effort. Dusk-dawn and rush hour traffic is when I add a rear light. I add a front light.. at night.
I wear cycling specific clothing which is often bright and has reflect trim. I might consider a vest under the right (wrong?) circumstances.
Selecting my equipment is pragmatic decision making. Processes or routines added for a "feeling" of safety are merely superstition. A go-cam or favorable horoscope will not make my cross town ride through traffic any safer. Besides being a form of transportation.... bicycling is a sport. One of the early lessons of sports is setting aside or working through fear. We can't bubble wrap ourselves and still pedal. We have to accept that yes we are breakable.
Bicycle vs automobile accidents can make for serious ouchies for the cyclist. But the alternative isn't layers of superstitious practices and processes. The only real alternative is an acceptance of the obvious risks.