Originally Posted by
DiabloScott
Good point, makes Garmin less unattractive.
1. A lot of talk with no experimental data.
2. Written from perspective of cars, not bikes.
3. Discusses tracking only; doesn't discuss elevation data at all, which was my point of contention concerning relative accuracy.
Got anything else?
In regards to elevation: the results from devices with altimeters compared to those that calculate on map data are wildly different. So, they can't both be accurate.