View Single Post
Old 01-05-14 | 11:53 AM
  #10  
FBinNY
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 39,897
Likes: 3,865
From: New Rochelle, NY

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Originally Posted by Andrew R Stewart
Well with campy NR ders the cable pull ratio dosen't matter, being designed around friction levers. And with the Shimano the cable pull ratio can be made slightly different depending on how far from the intended clamping point the cable is miss clamped at. Andy.
Yes, and no. Cable position doesn't matter if you don't care about indexing. But the response ratio and leverage do change when you move the cable from the far to near side. This can be an advantage or drawback depending on your objectives.

Moving to the near side, increases derailleur movement w/respect to the lever, so reduces lever travel through the range. But at the same time, it reduces leverage, so more finger force is needed.

I've often found switching the cable to the near side to help with FD action when chainring separation is higher than normal. In some cases, separating the rings, combined with near side cable routing combine to reduce outer ring rub when using the inner with the outer end of the cassette.

My rule #17 of wrenching applies. Start by following the book, but feel free to go off book if you have a reason, or seek a specific advantage.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Reply