View Single Post
Old 01-06-14 | 01:29 PM
  #107  
canam73
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,411
Likes: 13
From: Haunchyville
Originally Posted by Psimet2001
Slow day here in the tundra that is Chicago. All quotes answered....all parts ordered....all builds that can be built...uh...built....

Never come out here anymore but Facebook is awash with people taking travel selfies to CX nats and dashboard shots of thermometers and the occasional "LOOK AT HOW BADASS I AM I RODE A BIKE TODAY" selfies... *yawn*

I tried to read this whole thing. I made it through the first page. Instead it's much more fun to pick up random posts and poke some fun so...here we go:



1. Low spoke count - There's your problem. Spoke count does 1 thing - it provides enough tensioning elements supports the rim structure appropriately. It inversely affects aerodynamics and weight. Too many builders bow to the fancy of fashion and build them with too few spokes.
2. Flexing a kinlin....1400W.....sure......
3. Touching brake pads....don't set them so close. You know the brake levers move the whole distance of their throw - not just the first 2mm.
4. A too low spoke count with aero spokes....on a powertap. What's the point? General comment here, but what is a powertap for? Training? Isn't the point to get good numbers? Why house a system that is dependent on the flex of the system in order to produce good numbers (the point of it's existence) in a flexy, poor shell of a wheel? Vanity seems to be the only answer. It's definitely not a reasoned decision made with the intent of using the powertap for better training....when you step back and look at it.

so...have fun with the responses. I may jump back in....may not.
Fleabiscuit is obviously doping and banned is banned for life.
canam73 is offline  
Reply