View Single Post
Old 01-20-14 | 07:10 AM
  #6  
merlinextraligh's Avatar
merlinextraligh
pan y agua
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 31,812
Likes: 1,235
From: Jacksonville

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Originally Posted by Bezalel
The 6703 spider is a double and it uses a triplizer middle ring so you can't mount the inner ring without the middle one. Regarding the crank arm, the 6700 and 6703 use the same left crank arm.

The Garmin Vector looks better but it costs almost twice as much (but it measures both legs).
I've been using Vector on the Captain's crank for about 3 months now. Other than a couple of setup glitches, it's worked fine. I can't see any difference in the data from the Quarq on my single bike.

The Stages Power meter is supposed to be improved with its second generation of software ( see DCrainmakers review).

I'd prefer the garmin over the Stages because:

1) Vector appears to be a more mature product from a mature company, wheras Stages is a startup. Virtually every new power meter design released has had some initial problems. All the testing and delays Garmin went through bringing Vector to market gives them an edge in that department;

2) Vector gives you actual power from both legs, not an extrapolation from 1 leg.

Obviously cost is an issue, but if you're going to have to make changes in the drivetrain to utilize a Stages crank, the cost savings get smaller.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Reply