View Single Post
Old 01-31-14 | 09:23 AM
  #15  
dddd's Avatar
dddd
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,835
Likes: 1,816
From: Northern California

Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.

Originally Posted by Matariki
I've had this problem as well. The reason that it becomes apparent going up hills is that there is additional frame flex. Because the cable moves less freely, the RD moves instead with the flexing.

Morksmith's follow up indicates that it is the shifter that slips first, then of course the derailer follows the resulting cable movement toward a smaller cog.

So Matariki, your comment is still valid.
I think that when the cable can't slide easily within the rear-most cable-housing loop, that frame flexing tugs more forcefully on the shifter, enough to cause unwanted movement. And yes, even the cable guide down at the bb can be a culprit here by preventing the cable wire from "going with the flow" of the downtube's flexing.

But a shifter should never have to be set so stiff and tight as to prevent easy shifting(!!!).
I don't think that a bike can be ridden well in the hills like that, and I always keep my shifters oiled up, and with tension settings as light as I can get away with.
And, except for the possible scenario where a 225lb "weightlifter" is perhaps riding a 753-tubed featherweight steel frameset, I think that everybody's shifters should ideally be set to a similar, very "light" action.

So, modern chain, together with silky-smooth cabling (really inexpensive on a downtube-shifted bike), and a very light shifter tension setting should, taken together, allow most riders to shift fast and effortlessly when needed.

Last edited by dddd; 01-31-14 at 09:36 AM.
dddd is offline  
Reply