Originally Posted by
cooker
Smug, eh? It's always those guys are smug, or that person is smug. "Smug" is a bit of a red flag word, because you never call someone smug that you agree with, or if they're talking about something neutral like they own a dog. You only call them smug if their message is somehow annoying or threatening or otherwise offensive to you. Who really cares if someone talks all the time about being TV free? The question is why does that particular message cause you to label them smug, when you wouldn't call them smug if they prattled on about their dog all the time?
Mr. Cooker, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.