Originally Posted by
joseff
Flex-wise, I find my 300km old Cambium firmer than my B17 Aged of the last 4 years. In terms of absorbing road irregularities, they are more or less equal.
You also need to know that the fabric top of the C17 absorbs moisture (rain, sweat, etc) despite Brooks' claim of waterproofing.
Does the Cambium darken with use? Seems like it would, which is why I believe saddles historically have been sold in a black finish. I wonder if the canvas cover material isn't rougher than leather and more likely to abrade bicycle shorts.
I have a B17 with ~800 miles. When new it was slippery and hard as a board, and twice as heavy as any modern-design saddle. After waterproofing treatment it began to sag, despite tying the skirts, and I found the saggy, hammock-like feel uncomfortable, so I quit using it. I would consider a Cambium if it doesn't suffer from the same tendency to sag with use as all tensioned leather saddles.
Brooks' advertising states "the new construction of Cambium Saddles works like a hammock and delivers immediate comfort while absorbing vibration and shock, performance traditionally found only with natural leather saddles". I know I'm not alone in wanting a fairly firm saddle that doesn't sag and hammock like a traditional Brooks saddle. I think it odd that Brooks actually describes the Cambrium as having this same potential flaw, but portrays it as a main design feature.