Old 02-28-14 | 06:55 AM
  #11  
chaadster
Thread Killer
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 13,127
Likes: 2,154
From: Ann Arbor, MI

Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada

Originally Posted by Crescent Cycle
No, I'm saying being able to have a relaxed fit without resorting to extreme seatposts and stems is part of a relaxed frame geometry. You can't just declare a frame relaxed because it has a slack front end.
I just can't follow your reasoning on this. A relaxed geo frame is a relaxed geo frame irrespective of which components you put on it or how upright your position is on it. A relaxed fit on an aggressive frame is going to yield a different ride quality than a relaxed fit on a relaxed frame.

Relaxed fit is not the same as relaxed geometry, and I don't understand why you have difficulty with that concept.
chaadster is offline  
Reply