View Single Post
Old 03-07-14 | 07:34 AM
  #2  
NOS88's Avatar
NOS88
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,489
Likes: 6
From: Montgomery County, Pennsylvania
Originally Posted by WestMass
For some reason I thought back to a comment or an alternative 'zine at a punk show where the argument was made that going camping was offensive because it was essentially people who have shelter and live a comfortable life going out into the woods and intentionally "playing poor" or imagining that they lived a life of less privilege as a sort of exciting game to play or "roughing it", and how that might seem to be mockery to a person actually doesn't have shelter or comfort on a regular basis...



Part of the reason I thought about it was because I don't know that I generally categorize bicycle hobbyist/enthusiast commuters and people who can not afford a car or who have a DUI or whatever in the same category - and I felt a little guilty separating them. I ride through some fairly impoverished areas and occasionally see people on cheapo, old bicycles, kids' bikes, bmxes, etc. who are under-dressed for the weather, and I wonder how ******-y I look to them with my "fancy" lights, helmet, cycling jacket, and panniers.

Thoughts?
The argument concerning camping is based on some pretty sketchy assumptions - e.g., that people are imaging they live a less privileged life. This is an argument that contains bad inferences. The premise simply does not support the conclusion.

As to how you look to others, regardless of economic status, I suspect varies greatly from individual to individual.
__________________
A conclusion is the place where you got tired of thinking. - S. Wright
Favorite rides in the stable: Indy Fab CJ Ti - Colnago MXL - S-Works Roubaix - Habanero Team Issue - Jamis Eclipse carbon/831
NOS88 is offline  
Reply