Originally Posted by
Dunbar
I'll take Andy Coggan's word over anyone in this thread. He's actually demonstrated that he knows what he's talking about.
Only if you read him selectively to support your untenable conclusion. If you read him with any care at all, his "word" does not support your position.
Stop trying to win this argument by appealing to an authority whose writings are not consistent with your claim.
Well, just stop. Please? Stop.