View Single Post
Old 03-19-14 | 12:43 PM
  #42  
Jim from Boston's Avatar
Jim from Boston
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 219
Originally Posted by FBinNY
It's not that I lack sympathy for the victim (who didn't seem injured, though her bike might have been damaged). It's that law or no law, she failed to display some common sense and situational awareness (especially if she'd been doored before). The fact is that I blame the law for giving her the sense that it offered a protection that there's no way it could ensure.

I don't know the details of the Australian dooring law, but this was a service lane where one should reasonably expect that cabs would stop and discharge passengers. It's reasonable to expect that passengers would open doors on the curb side. So if the law prevents cabs from pulling closer because of a bike lane (if there was one), then there will always be doorings if/when cyclists pass between cabs and curbs --- law or no law. Something has to change, or the problem will continue because it's designed in.

Originally Posted by anon06
Wow, it's astounding that cyclists on the internet have no compassion for other cyclists who become injured.

The police, who know the local law, sided with her...
Well said FBinNY, and to quote your signature line, "An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.". Furthermore as a corollary reply, like the "gun nuts" say, "When seconds count, the police are minutes away."

I did watch the video, and cringed when the door opened, but I could not imagine being in such a squeezed position, not prepared to stop when the cab did.

Last edited by Jim from Boston; 03-19-14 at 12:54 PM.
Jim from Boston is offline  
Reply