Originally Posted by
acidfast7
I see that this conversation is becoming prototypically American ... as in if I call a market "minor" based on your definition, you're insulted.
You claimed special "cars" for your market.
Now, you're showing the entire market.
Logically fallacy.
Distill all of the Honda Accords, Toyota Camrys/Crowns/Corollas out of those numbers ...
then get back to me with the "special vehicles to chase this market you call 'minor'?"
then we can discuss like adults
I am actually not insulted, but I don't see facts to indicate the US is a minor market. The facts I see I would interpret the opposite way.
The US is different in many ways, some I like, some I don't. I actually wish the US market would embrace dynamo lighting and more efficient/practical cars (its better then it was but has a long way to go). I don't know why your jumping on my one statement. I was simply pointing out that the US market is significant enough that auto manufactures make a lot of vehicles specific for the US market. If it was a minor market there would be less cars tailored specifically for it. Clearly there are big numbers so manufactures want to be in the US market.
I thought I was discussing like an adult. I am questioning a statement you made, which really wasn't even relevant to bike lighting, not a judge of character like you did, assuming I was insulted by your statement.