View Single Post
Old 03-24-14, 11:17 PM
  #94  
kickstart
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by CB HI
I asked for passing laws using the word yield and even after I pointed out that the one passing law you quoted did not use the word yield and that the other law was a slow moving vehicle law, you remain clueless that you have not supported your claims.

By your claimed standard yielding = "you're not supposed to interfere with", then the passing vehicle must yield to the vehicle being passed because the passing vehicle is not supposed to interfere with the vehicle being passed. Your use of the word yield is improper in this case and that is why you are confused with your claims of people not knowing your claimed yielding in the passing laws.
No matter how you try to spin or manipulate it, you're still wrong and you can't even see it. Read the other responses, perhaps you'll realize you're one of the few who doesn't understand.
kickstart is offline