Old 04-07-14 | 05:05 PM
  #6  
rpenmanparker's Avatar
rpenmanparker
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 28,682
Likes: 63
From: Houston, TX

Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build

Originally Posted by FBinNY
Sorry, but you have this backward for the normal tire and rim configuration.

Tires are pinched in forming sort of an Omega shaped profile. Air pressure tends to make the internal chamber round, wxcept where constrained by the rim. Allowing the beads to move apart increases the working circumference by the change in rim width (circumference = flat width of the unrestricted wall of the tire + rim width). A bigger circumference means a bigger diameter, both vertical and horizontal.

This would hold true until the rim was so wide that the tire ws stretched into a low arch, in which your logic would hold. But tires aren't on rims that wide, so it doesn't.
No problem, but Hillrider was saying much the same thing as I did. I was sure I was relating the accepted belief with regard to benefits of wider rims with same tires. That the resulting lower tire profile gave better stability in cornering and allowed running lower pressures. Perhaps I had misunderstood all that.
rpenmanparker is offline  
Reply