Originally Posted by
Doug64
I almost agree with this statement. If you want a touring bike get one that will do the job--function over form.
However, I have a Cannondale T2, Bianchi Volpe and a LHT, all 58 cm frames I really don't find a lot of difference in rides between the Aluminum framed Cannondale and the steel bikes, except that it is more stable. I've ridden all three bikes on multi-month tours. Front end shimmy at high speeds while going downhill loaded with the Volpe and the LHT is an issue; never with the Cannondale. I like the Volpe the best because of its handling characteristics, but if I'm really loaded down, I'd take the Cannondale over the LHT. The ride is about the same, and it handles better. I don't think an Aluminum frame should be a deal breaker in most case. Not many of us will ever do tours where repairs in 3rd world countries will be an issue. If I did, I'd use steel.
.
Thanks for your feed back. Not for praising aluminum frame. May be I should look at Cannondale, if I decide that I need a stiffer frame, for a more loaded tourer

.