A question.
Apparently cities are rated for bike friendliness based on the amount of bike specific infrastructure. So if they then pass laws that cyclists must use that infrastructure in lieu of the main roadway, is that also a friendly act?
I ask because there's widespread support for infrastructure, but seems to be opposition to must use laws. I don't have a problem with that and see the dichotomy, but have a strong feeling that the two are or will be linked in the minds of those who write laws, and the first will inexorably lead to the second.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.