View Single Post
Old 04-26-14 | 02:27 PM
  #24  
GriddleCakes's Avatar
GriddleCakes
Tawp Dawg
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,221
Likes: 0
From: Anchorage, AK

Bikes: '06 Surly Pugsley, '14 Surly Straggler, '88 Kuwahara Xtracycle, '10 Motobecane Outcast 29er, '?? Surly Cross Check (wife's), '00 Trek 4500 (wife's), '12 Windsor Oxford 3-speed (dogs')

Originally Posted by TransitBiker
Reading over this thread has really enlightened me to how different i am from most cyclists when it comes to this kind of topic. I pretty much never go anywhere without my backpack (even if its empty), and i doubt that will ever change....
I don't know, I'd say that the overwhelming majority of cyclists that I see use backpacks. Second to that would be rack mounted trunk bags, and third's probably split evenly between panniers and shopping bags hung on handlebars.

I used a backpack for almost ten years, before acquiring a bike with a rear rack, and later a set of panniers, and I only got those for carrying large, heavy loads, like groceries, textbooks, and recycling. I didn't initially intend to replace my commuting backpack with a pannier, but the experience of cycling without a backpack was so much more pleasant that I ditched the pack without a second thought.

I work in a restaurant, so employee storage is a communal space, and other than work shoes, we can't leave anything overnight. A single pannier takes up no more room than a backpack, and when loaded with mostly clothes (a single change in the summer, loads more in the winter [extra hat, second pair of gloves/mittens, extra thermal shirt, second neck warmer, ski goggles, extra socks, chemical hand warmers, insulated vest]), a towel, a book, and u-lock, it doesn't weigh enough to noticeably effect the bike's handling, and it's waterproof.
GriddleCakes is offline  
Reply