Originally Posted by
JohnJ80
You mischaracterized what I've said and done. To amplify on what I've said as well as recount:
1. I've corresponded with engineers at some of the helmet companies that incorporate MIPS.
First time you're mentioning this at all, actually. Care to share what information they have provided?
Originally Posted by
JohnJ80
2. I've corresponded with some of the technical people at MIPS themselves.
First time for this as well. Again, care to share?
Originally Posted by
JohnJ80
4. I have talked extensively with medical professionals, expert in TBI, about the benefits and deficits involved with helmets and their protection over the course of the last 18 months.
They reviewed MIPS? And what was said?
Originally Posted by
JohnJ80
Yes, more information would be a very good thing but this is not a decision without getting the information. Would it be nice if there was a nice little package of information with a bow on top? Sure. But that doesn't mean the information doesn't exist or that there is inadequate decision on which to make a reasonable decision.
If all I have to go on is a design company making a video, I'd call that inadequate.