Nope. Wrong again, bucko.
Lance cheated to a greater degree than anyone else in the peloton.
Also, greg simply said pantani was talented. He didn't say that pantani never cheated.
Additionally, greg or anyone can criticize armstrong all he or anyone else wants. Lance gave them tons of ammunition and will continue to do so simply as a result of his being a grade A doushebag.
We've only seen the tip of the iceberg revealed as of yet.
Originally Posted by
Gallo
ye of little syllogism if you are going to refer to logic "strawman argument" please provide validity to your above statements. Explain your proofs.
here let me help you
Given
Pantani doped to improve performance when illegal to do so
Lance doped doped to improve performance when illegal to do so
therefore we conclude they both Armstrong and Pantani cheated.
with the above given information being valid the conclusion is valid.
To paint either cyclist in a different light without proof is not logical.
To support one and not the other is hypocritical which was the OP point
So support your argument with simple logic that it was not hypocritical of Greg Le Mond to support Pantani and not Armstrong
While I am sure you will have many fallacies including the red herring, appeal to probability, circular reasoning.
I want to thank you for your answer in advance as I reason that there is no point in my further participation.