Old 05-23-14, 10:49 AM
  #11  
FoulHooked
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mr_bill
"Calhoun County Sheriff's Office While we knew this would be controversial. We have the duty to investigate all complaints brought to us. Knowing the nature of this case we presented it to the District Attorney's Office for review. Which resulted in the issuance of a warrant. [emphasis mine] It's a tough job that has to be done."

-mr. bill
^^^this

It was vetted; if the DA is willing to go after him, there must be something to it. There may be more to the videos too. There are other potential considerations than just what he says on the video; distracted driving (if unlawful there), passing on double solid (may not be exceptions in AL?). Reckless endangerment is not a free speech issue; it may have multiple definitions, but one is "a crime consisting of acts that create a substantial risk of serious physical injury to another person." I don't see how video commentary can possibly meet this threshold, so they must be pursuing it for other reasons.
FoulHooked is offline