Old 05-25-14 | 02:17 PM
  #78  
FBinNY
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 39,897
Likes: 3,865
From: New Rochelle, NY

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Originally Posted by Andy_K
This discussion has me rethinking the idea that I could get a shorter post.

More to the point, the 287mm post on my carbon road bike was right at the minimum insertion point and only just meets the second criteria above (assuming you mean the diameter of the post and not the outer diameter of the seat tube). I think I may look into a longer post for that bike.
Glad I could clarify and help prevent would would have been a mistake. Yes, the rules for insertion of pegs relate to the diameter of the peg, and not what it fits in. You probably won't gain anything with a longer post that meets the minimum guideline (unless the frame calls for it) since the rule already has a safety margin built in. But if you're upgrading anyway, going longer can't hurt (it just won't help either).

BTW- your mtn bike is a ood example of why I think minimum post mark on the frame is important. These long tube models are the ones dealers see coming back broken and customers innocently complaining that the post was within the required depth.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Reply