Originally Posted by
chaadster
Luddite does not qualify as "name calling", and it is totally fair to call him that, because in common parlance, a Luddite is someone who eschews technology, which is precisely what his doing in the cycling context choosing to ride without speedometer/cadence/power, etc. I, too, appreciate him sharing his thoughts and expertise, and as I said, I appreciate his perspective from philosophical standpoint-- you know, the purity of cycling and all that, being in touch with one's body, so on and so forth-- but if he's having trouble grasping why telemetric data is of interest to the cycling community, then hopefully he can appreciate my participation here, as well.
Chad, aside from gear you are riding in, can you explain what telemetric deficit exists between Campy and Shimano...or Sram?
I ride Campy and Shimano with telemetry from my Garmin 500 which I sometimes download from every ride. I know what cadence and speed I am riding at a given time and only a simple computation to determine what gear I am pushing.
Also, in the hierarch of telemetric data collection, can you explain why what precise gear you are in for a given ride matters? Let's say as a priority or even adjunct to cadence, power, heart rate, instantaneous speed, distance, altitude?