View Single Post
Old 06-10-14, 04:53 PM
  #10  
dtrain
L-I-V-I-N
 
dtrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Stafford, OR
Posts: 4,796
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by chaadster
The problem is that a compact double doesn't do anything to increase his speed, nor does it do anything to help climbing beyond what the triple offers, I don't think. We don't have enough info to speculate on how to optimize gearing, so the wide range of a triple is a more sensible choice for that reason.
+1. The compact would a touch lighter and likely easier to dail-in the shifting. But those are very modest differences and hardly worth the cost (especially if it's shifting well enough). The benefits of a wheelset might not be worth the cost either - but they'd be more beneficial and are a much more flexible upgrade. Sell 'em if you don't notice a difference, sell the old if you do, keep an extra set around (flats or spoke issues), have the nicer set ready to transfer to that 'next' bike, etc.
__________________
"The older you do get, the more rules they're gonna try to get you to follow. You just gotta keep livin', man, L-I-V-I-N." - Wooderson

'14 carbon Synapse - '12 CAAD 10 5 - '99 Gary Fisher Big Sur
dtrain is offline