Old 06-21-14, 01:38 AM
  #1  
Super D
Full Member
 
Super D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: San Diego
Posts: 227

Bikes: Canyon Road, Argon18 TT, DF Track

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Liked 11 Times in 8 Posts
Which is the better climber, Scott Addict vs Scott Foil?

Has anyone tested the Scott Addict and Foil back-to-back on hills to compare and see which one is the better climber?

It would have to be the stiffer carbon HMX vs HMX (HMX used on the Team and 10 frames) ... or the less stiff HMF vs HMF (non-Team and 15, 20, 30, etc frames), to be a fair fight/comparo.

I've got a 2011 Addict R2 and I'm very curious about the Foil. Specifically the Foil variants with HMX carbon. I'm very much enjoying the Addict, but just curious as to 1) what the climbing difference would be going from HMF to HMX, and 2) what the climbing dfference would be going from the Addict to an equivalent carbon Foil, all other components being equal.
Super D is offline