View Single Post
Old 06-27-14 | 01:53 PM
  #187  
jyl's Avatar
jyl
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,643
Likes: 68
From: Portland OR

Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997

I've wondered if there is some way Citibikes can "crowdsource" the rebalancing.

Suppose they offered to pay $X to ride a bike from a crowded station to an empty station .

The way it might work is, their software identifies a need to have fewer bikes at stations A B C and more at stations X Y Z and that it is worth $X to them; they notify you of this offer, either via the Citibikes smartphone app or via text; "you" being Citibike users who have opted-in to these offers; if it is worth your time, you take a bike from station C and ride it to station Y and $X is paid to the credit card you have on file. $X would be dynamic - if they have a rebalancer en route anyway, X might be low or zero, but if no rebalancer is going to be available for hours and the need is great, then X would be higher.

Would this work? What would X have to be, to motivate someone to ride a bike from, say, mid-town to west side at 9 am, after the first wave of commuters has emptied the west side stations and filled the mid-town stations? And would that X be low enough to actually reduce Citibike's rebalancing costs? I have previously guesstimated it might cost them $1-2 to rebalance a bike, if you include fully loaded cost of the rebalancer, his truck or bike, benefits and payroll fees/taxes.
jyl is offline  
Reply