View Single Post
Old 06-30-14 | 11:46 AM
  #21  
indyfabz's Avatar
indyfabz
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 45,234
Likes: 23,396
Originally Posted by DCwom
The C&O is NOT a rail trail and does not have what most would consider a "rail-trail surface". We've used 32mm on the GAP and other rail-trails with crushed limestone type surfaces, and have never had a problem. From what I've heard from others the C&O would warrant a wider tire.
+1. I did the GAP last September fully loaded on 32c Conti Contacts as part of a cross=PA tour. No problem, and I probably would not have wanted anything narrower or wider. But from all accounts, the C&O, which is a canal path, not a rail-trail, is an entirely different animal.
indyfabz is offline  
Reply