Originally Posted by
I-Like-To-Bike
Subsidizing money losing transit lines to less dense areas with little demand for it, or reallocating resources to likely-to-be almost unused bicycling facilities to the same locations, principally to meet the desires/demands of a relative handfull of urban car-free bird watchers, smug anti-sprawl/anti-car moralists, or bicycling enthusiasts who want to meet their total mileage goals, does not seem to pass the sniff test as a good investment of public money.
What about the cost of freeways to those areas?