View Single Post
Old 07-08-14 | 11:04 AM
  #36  
mconlonx's Avatar
mconlonx
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,552
Likes: 135
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
Belt drive at present is for those seeking an "elegant" solution for a non-existent problem, and who choose to ignore any non elegant problems associated with belt drive.
This.

Belt drives seem to appeal to those who want to overthink the whole bicycling thing.

Adds $250 to the retail price of a bike compared to the same bike with a chain. That alone dictates that belt drive bikes will sell less well. And you have less options for adjusting the gearing to suit your needs.

What I really love are the belt drive bikes (belts are cleaner!) which come with, er, belt-guards. As clean as they are, they didn't manage to figure out how to make it so they wouldn't suck in a pant-leg or shoestring...

Regarding non-elegant solutions -- I think Trek went through three different designs for the rear dropouts in as many years on the District before they just dropped it altogether.
mconlonx is offline  
Reply