Originally Posted by
duanedr
I don't like how
#7 has a removable rack but the fender mounts are on the rack so, you either have both rack and fenders or neither...I suppose there's no problem with it but logically it just doesn't add up. The user would end up with more versatility with a standard configuration of eyelets on the dropouts. Obviously this is purely a functional argument and reflects nothing of the amazing work and workmanship of the bikes he produces. great stuff...
To me, function is the purpose of making custom touring frames. But if you actually meet the functional idea the client has in mind, it is not likely to be the most versatile imaginable ride. Ideally, the client knows what he wants, finds the builder that can do it, and they produce a pared back ride that has everything needed, and nothing that is not. Of the rack rides are marketed on their versatility (fits a ton of people other than you), because they can't meet a narrow aim. Having achieved that, other riders may have very good reasons for not seeing what they really want.