View Single Post
Old 07-27-14, 08:32 AM
  #46  
jimmyt5150
Newbie
 
jimmyt5150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Hagerstown, MD
Posts: 4

Bikes: Trek 8.4 DS

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
As a guy that bikes more for the aerobic benefits than the hobby aspect, a heart rate monitor will allow you to develop a pace that's not only beneficial to burning fat, but will allow you to enjoy the sport.

I ride a flat path with crushed stone and mud. To hit a HR of 130, I roll out 4:30 miles. To average 4:15 miles, I'm in the 140s. To hit a a 4:00 mile, I'm high 140s to 150s.

When I'm just sightseeing, a 5:00 mile has me around 115bpm.

So just picking up the pace a few miles per hour completely changes the effectiveness of a bike workout. The only way to keep you honest is a HR monitor.


Here is a link to a recent ride. I did ride to and from the trail head, so you'll see some downhill and uphill times. Miles 5-19 are on the trail.

http://connect.garmin.com/activity/549457427




Sent from my iPad

Last edited by jimmyt5150; 07-27-14 at 08:37 AM.
jimmyt5150 is offline