View Single Post
Old 07-28-14 | 05:05 PM
  #17  
dynaryder's Avatar
dynaryder
DancesWithSUVs
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,454
Likes: 341
From: Wash DC
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
The 29'' designation is just a marketing gimmick trying to create a new market for bikes with fatter tires.
Originally Posted by irwin7638
29er is just another meaningless marketing gimmick which has nor real relevance.
You're both wrong. Originally,'29er' was the term used to differentiate very wide 700c MTB tires(2"+). The intent was to make MTB's with larger diameter wheels so they would roll over obstacles easier than bikes with smaller 26" wheels. The term was later watered down by companies using it as a buzz word to describe bikes with wide(38mm+) tires. But there are advantages(and disadvantages) to 29ers over 26ers,which is why they're so prevalent.

I do agree they're getting a bit silly in marketing odd sizes like 650 to recreational riders,but the pros do have their preferences.
__________________

C'dale BBU('05 and '09)/Super Six/Hooligan8and 3,Kona Dew Deluxe,Novara Buzz/Safari,Surly Big Dummy,Marin Pt Reyes,Giant Defy 1,Schwinn DBX SuperSport,Brompton S6L/S2E-X/M6L-X/S12 T Line












dynaryder is offline  
Reply