View Single Post
Old 07-31-14, 01:29 PM
  #27  
scott967
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Oahu, HI
Posts: 1,396

Bikes: 89 Paramount OS 84 Fuji Touring Series III New! 2013 Focus Izalco Ergoride

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 285 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 74 Times in 54 Posts
Originally Posted by reddog3

I tried searching it again, can't find it. But came across this interesting article- Crank Length: Coming Full Circle - Cycling Utah | Cycling Utah

Take away (for me)

"So switching from 175 to 172.5 mm would likely have little measurable or even undetectable benefit. The main point is that you would be safe switching to shorter cranks for aerodynamic reasons, as proposed by Cobb, without fear of decreasing efficiency. In fact, research implies your efficiency would increase somewhat.”

Seems to be based on the linear velocity of pedal, which for a given cadence is higher with longer crank.

scott s.
.
scott967 is offline