View Single Post
Old 08-03-14, 08:33 AM
  #81  
twocicle
Clipless in Coeur d'Alene
 
twocicle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
Posts: 1,996

Bikes: Tandems: Calfee Dragonfly S&S, Ventana ECDM mtb; Singles: Specialized Tarmac SL4 S-Works, Specialized Stumpjumper Pro, etal.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 164 Post(s)
Liked 22 Times in 15 Posts
Originally Posted by waynesulak
True it is the ring count that limits the gears but the primary reason for giving up a triple is often to allow for the right side sync. It seems that the main reasons two rings get used on tandems are either Di2 or right side sync ruling out a triple. I haven 't seen too many posts about a modern double ring, left side sync, mechanical shifting tandem.
IMO, those assumptions are debatable and I've mostly been ignoring mechanical because this thread is about Di2. I will say that after running the Shimano Dura-Ace 9000 mechanical 11spd on my single, the drivetrain is very finicky and no way I would run that on a tandem. Conversely, since Di2 shifting is so precise and headache free (re: auto trims the FD and maintains RD cage alignment without constant tweaking wire tension) that if running Shimano 11spd, Di2 is the only sane choice.

There is only one mfr who promotes RSD/SSD, otherwise it's not that typical of an implementation. I believe Di2 is much more prevalent regardless of what crankset (crossover or SSD) is installed and the primary reasons for using Di2 are entirely unrelated.

Last edited by twocicle; 08-03-14 at 01:57 PM.
twocicle is offline