View Single Post
Old 08-04-14 | 10:44 AM
  #1  
gzank6
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Southern California

Bikes: 1988 Peugeot Bordeaux

Looking at 2000 GT XCR 3000

I read the old reviews and looks like a great bike. Obviously I'm looking to keep my cost down here. So far just looking at pics on CL, bike looks to be in good condition.

I'm new into MTB and am just riding a wal-mart schwinn sidewinder that I picked up at a consignment sale for $30. i started out just riding small hills new my house (so. california) but have graduated into the mountain single tracks. I'm not much into the downhill, but maybe that is because this bike won't hold up to it but I really enjoy climbing. I could see doing some downhilling the future.

Now, is a 14 year old bike in excellent condition a better value than buying something new say off bikesdirect.com for 300 to 400?
One thing the GT lacks is disc brakes. That seems like a certain for downhills no?
Are HT more for climbing and FS more for downhill?
Is there a great weight diff between HT and FS?

thanks
gzank6 is offline  
Reply