Thread: Crank Lenght
View Single Post
Old 08-30-14 | 12:41 PM
  #12  
ThermionicScott's Avatar
ThermionicScott
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 22,676
Likes: 2,642
From: CID

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

I think a longer crank does give more leverage, all else being equal. But if you don't have the longer legs to push it, you'll strain and need to shift to a lower gear, cancelling it out.

It seems that crank length isn't a big deal for the vast majority of people since so many other things on the bike (leg extension, saddle fore-aft, etc) can be adjusted around it to get reasonably optimum power output and comfort. It is too bad that the larger companies don't at least take a token interest in the outlying sizes, though -- making smaller runs of cranks like 155mm or 190mm wouldn't directly help the bottom line, but loss leaders like that can help with goodwill and winning customers over to your brand.
ThermionicScott is offline  
Reply