Originally Posted by
chasm54
The parallel with running is flawed. Cycling is easy on the joints and doesn't require the same elasticity - "bounce" - that, when lost, turns a runner into a plodder. In other words, cyclists need the engine, but don't put as much stress on the transmission.
Last year while racing I met a nice gentleman who was bemoaning the fact that the previous day he had performed poorly in a 40k time trial, having finished in 64 minutes. He was 75 years old.
I was so delighted with the Marathon Chart! Such a beautiful answer to my question.
Then I read you and realize your point is well-taken. I myself am a former runner (miler, track team captain in HS, best marathon of 2:51:39 [at age 39]). My knee joints forced me to stop running. Your phrasing is absolutely perfect -
elasticity and
bounce - well done.
So where's the exact same chart for some huge cycling event?