View Single Post
Old 09-10-14, 10:37 PM
  #19  
Roody
Sophomoric Member
 
Roody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dancing in Lansing
Posts: 24,221
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 711 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by dwbstr
I don't think there is much danger of the people or city planners taking the PRT or similar proposals seriously unless they are forced to. Given the public's love of the automobile, they would really want something less radical to work.
Personally, I don't see much benefit to PRT instead of personal car ownership. I think the total size of the vehicle fleet would be the same, and total miles traveled would be the same or greater. There would also be a greater concentration of wealth in corporations, since companies would own the vehicles rather than individuals. I don't necessarily see that as a good thing.
__________________

"Think Outside the Cage"
Roody is offline