Originally Posted by Clyde1820

If the slower vehicle was a car, I highly doubt they'd have ruled the slower car was lawfully required to exit the roadway in unsafe spots just to sooth the spleen of trailing vehicles.

Yet, that's what the ruling states in this case, for the cyclist. Doesn't appreciate how dangerous it can be to continually move off and onto the pavement, particularly on certain roads where the "shoulder" areas are terrible combinations of ruts and other impediments to remaining in the saddle.