Originally Posted by
Willbird
Looking at it again I guess what it tells me, is that Strava is fairly consistent in how many watts it awards for a given speed :-).
Bill
Seems to be, at least for a sample of four people, though there is one outlier. It would be interesting to see how the rest of the list compares.
I'd also like to see why it gave one rider (#39 on the list) a reading almost 10% lower than the others at the same average speed. Did he enter physical measurements significantly smaller than the others?