View Single Post
Old 09-24-14, 06:11 PM
  #2  
Scooper
Decrepit Member
 
Scooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Santa Rosa, California
Posts: 10,488

Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22, several Paramounts

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 634 Post(s)
Liked 69 Times in 57 Posts
I'm no Ti expert or guru, but here's my take based on the materials data sheets and what I've read in various framebuilders forums. Take this for the $.02 it's worth.

3Al-2.5V has a "stiffness" modulus (E) of 100 GPa, while 6Al-4V has a "stiffness" modulus (E) of 113.8 GPa, so the latter is about 14% stiffer, but frankly the wall thickness and diameters of the tubes are going to have a much greater effect of the frame stiffness than the alloy.

The density of both 3Al-2.5V and 6Al-4V is close to the same. 3Al-2.5V has a density of 4.48 g/cc, while 6Al-4V has a density of 4.43 g/cc, so 6Al-4V weighs a hair less for the same volume of material.

There is a significant difference in ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and yield strength (YS) between the two. 3Al-2.5V UTS=620 MPa and YS=500 MPa. 6Al-4V UTS=970 MPa and YS=880 MPa, so 6Al-4V is about 50% stronger than 3Al-2.5V.

Hardness (Brinell) for 3Al-2.5V is 256, while 6Al-4V is 334.

I believe most builders who work with titanium will tell you that 3Al-2.5V is easier to work with.

There are trade-offs, but if I were considering a Ti frame I would go with 3Al-2.5V personally.




__________________
- Stan

my bikes

Science doesn't care what you believe.
Scooper is offline