View Single Post
Old 10-03-14 | 10:46 AM
  #35  
bmthom.gis's Avatar
bmthom.gis
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,977
Likes: 5
From: Columbia, SC

Bikes: 2014 Cannondale Synapse Carbon 4 Rival; 2014 Cannondale Trail 7 29; 1972 Schwinn Suburban, 1996 Proflex 756, 1987(?) Peugeot, Dahon Speed P8; 1979 Raleigh Competition GS; 1995 Stumpjumper M2 FS, 1978 Raleigh Sports, Schwinn Prologue

Originally Posted by cyccommute
Nope. Don't own one. But my chops have been busted many, many times about how I'm "spraying light into the trees (or people's eyes or into drivers eyes or into airplane cockpits)". I've been told over and over again how "irresponsible" I am for not using lights that have shaped beams. It's rather surprising that the "wonders of German engineering" need a glare shield to keep the light out of the bike rider's eyes. Seems like a design flaw (and a dirty little secret) to me...one that my irresponsible lights don't seem to have.

Given the flaw, I'm even less likely to own any of them.
I'm not entirely convinced you need the glare shield. I haven't tried it on a dark ride yet, but when I do, I'll post results. The only thing I can think is that since the lens all around has visibility, something with the way the reflectors are set might bring some unwanted light straight up, and it is probably only a minor annoyance to the rider. I wouldn't have spent any extra money on buying one, but mine came with it so I put it on for aesthetic purposes
bmthom.gis is offline  
Reply