View Single Post
Old 10-10-14 | 08:46 PM
  #25  
rpenmanparker's Avatar
rpenmanparker
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 28,682
Likes: 63
From: Houston, TX

Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build

Originally Posted by StanSeven
I laugh when I hear this. I'm as much a car guy am a bike guy. Automatics out perform manual transmissions in every way except maybe fuel economy, and that's slight. Quarter mile acceleration time differences are several te the of a second difference in some models. The intelligence on a race course or twisting roads on gear selection can't be matched except for the very top professionals. For braking or just slowing down, you can select a gear just as easy in an auto than a manual.
I pretty much agree. I can't believe the mileage difference still falls in favor of the stick. With high end automatic transmissions having as many as 8 speeds and computer control of the shifting, I don't see how the average ham-fisted, lead-footed schmoe could get better mileage with a stick. Maybe the various Formula 1 drivers who hide behind other identities on the 41 can do it, but it would be a very rare thing. To beat the computer, every shift would have to be perfect. Fat chance!

As far as more fun, well whatever burns your gas. Vroom, vroom!
rpenmanparker is offline  
Reply